Solutions
LinkedIn as a second channel inside the same sequence
LinkedIn steps sit inside the same sequence as email, so each touch knows what the last one said. Action limits are agreed with you, per seat, before anything is connected.
In the workspace
LinkedIn is a step inside the email sequence
Templates hold the steps, the days between them and the channel of each. A reply on any channel stops the rest.
One sequence, two channelsThe problem
What changes with IntellReach
Before
Where outbound breaks
- Automated LinkedIn tools put your people's accounts at risk
- LinkedIn and email run separately and contradict each other
- Messages are generic because nobody has time to research
After
After IntellReach
- A single sequence across email and LinkedIn with shared context
- Sensible daily limits and human-like behaviour to protect accounts
- A reply on either channel stops both
What is included
How it is delivered
Multichannel sequencing
Email and LinkedIn steps planned together, with timing rules.
Account safety
Conservative action limits per seat, agreed with you.
Personalised messages
Written from the same research as the email track.
Unified reply handling
Interest on any channel routed to the same owner.
FAQ
Questions we get asked
Can the LinkedIn step be turned off?
Yes, per campaign, any time. The email steps carry on unchanged.
Do you need access to our LinkedIn accounts?
LinkedIn steps run through your team's seats with limits you approve. We explain the risks and the safeguards before anything is connected.
Where to next
- How IntellReach WorksThe process, week by week
- REACH Framework™Research, Engage, Advance, Convert, Hone. How every campaign runs
- Managed OutboundTargeting to handoff, run for you and recorded in your workspace
- Outbound Lead GenerationAccounts and contacts built against your criteria, validated, owned by you
Start with a strategy session
Forty-five minutes with an outbound specialist. Bring your closed-won list and last quarter’s outbound. We will tell you which accounts we would target first, what the first sequence would say, and whether we think IntellReach is a fit. If it is not, we will say so.